Biological Psychiatry

13.1k papers and 864.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 13.1k papers published in Biological Psychiatry in the last decades have received a total of 864.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Biological Psychiatry usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (3.9k papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (3.5k papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.8k papers) specifically the topics of Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1.7k papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (1.7k papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biological Psychiatry are Ronald S. Duman, Wayne C. Drevets, Charles B. Nemeroff, Stephen V. Faraone, Scott L. Rauch, Dennis S. Charney, Ronald C. Kessler, Andrew H. Miller, Joseph Biederman and Lisa M. Monteggia.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biological Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biological Psychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biological Psychiatry.

Countries where authors publish in Biological Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biological Psychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biological Psychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biological Psychiatry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025