James Field

692 citations
26 papers · 437 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Qualitative Research Methods and Applications 3
    • Online and Blended Learning 2
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies 2
    • Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics 3

James Field

23 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

James Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Education 99
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 6
  • Communication 15
  • Molecular Biology 131
  • Music 6
Replace Jennifer L. Cohen with:
Jennifer L. Cohen United States
Mary Evans United States
Sally Mitchell United States
Anne O’Connor Ireland
Jackie Lee Hong Kong
Michael Samuel South Africa
Michael Peterson United States
Ruha Benjamin United States
Jacqueline Watson United Kingdom
Kathleen E. Kennedy United States
James Field relative to Jennifer L. Cohen United States Jennifer L. Cohen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jennifer L. Cohen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Field. The network helps show where James Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Field Line = papers co-authored together James Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013171
2 201574
3 200142
4 201723
5 201519
6 200517
7 198616
8 199912
9 201210
10 199210
11 20038
12 20136
13 20174
14 20134
15 20144
16 20143
17 19943
18 19963
19 19982
20 20212

About James Field

James Field is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Communication and Urban Studies, having authored 26 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (3 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (3 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Applications (3 papers), Public Spaces through Art (3 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (2 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (99 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (6 citations), Communication (15 citations), Molecular Biology (131 citations) and Music (6 citations). James Field has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Macintyre Latta, Nancy J. Moules, Catherine M. Laing, Graham McCaffrey, Andrea E. Price, Andrea Throop, Joshua LaBaer, Jin G. Park, Preston Hunter and Amit Sharma. Their work appears in journals such as Teaching and Teacher Education, Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, Nucleic Acids Research, Contemporary Educational Technology and Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact