Mark Lochrie

458 citations
49 papers · 354 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Lochrie

47 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

Mark Lochrie
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Human-Computer Interaction 143
  • Computer Science Applications 54
  • Communication 37
  • Museology 17
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 30
Replace Craig M. MacDonald with:
Craig M. MacDonald United States
Tracee Vetting Wolf United States
María Menéndez-Blanco Italy
Nicolas Nova Switzerland
Catriona Macaulay United Kingdom
Mikko Rajanen Finland
Erica Robles United States
Yinni Guo United States
Gunnar Harboe United States
Robert Ramberg Sweden
Mark Lochrie relative to Craig M. MacDonald United States Craig M. MacDonald's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Craig M. MacDonald · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Lochrie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Lochrie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Lochrie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Lochrie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Lochrie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Lochrie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Lochrie. The network helps show where Mark Lochrie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Lochrie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Lochrie Line = papers co-authored together Mark Lochrie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201241
2 201440
3 201438
4 201124
5 201517
6 201715
7 201514
8 201014
9 201314
10 20129
11 20147
12 20147
13 20147
14 20197
15 20116
16 20136
17
Tweeting with the telly on!:Mobile Phones as Second Screen for TV
20126
18 20166
19 20106
20 20155

About Mark Lochrie

Mark Lochrie is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Science Applications, Museology, Sociology and Political Science and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 49 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (14 papers), Digital Games and Media (10 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (7 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (6 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (5 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (5 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (5 papers) and Teaching and Learning Programming (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (143 citations), Computer Science Applications (54 citations), Communication (37 citations), Museology (17 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (30 citations). Mark Lochrie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovenia and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Paul Coulton, Bran Knowles, Klen Čopič Pucihar, Lynne Blair, Adrian Gradinar, Matjaž Kljun, Graham A. Cooper, James Field, John J. Mills and Jon Whittle. Their work appears in journals such as Interacting with Computers, IEEE Pervasive Computing, IT Professional, Lecture notes in computer science and International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact