Ingo Forstenlechner

29 papers receiving 880 citations

Peers

Ingo Forstenlechner
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Communication 230
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 173
  • Sociology and Political Science 639
  • Gender Studies 130
  • Strategy and Management 192
Replace Verner Worm with:
Verner Worm Denmark
Jos Gamble United Kingdom
Aminu Mamman United Kingdom
Hugh Louch United States
Frank M. Horwitz South Africa
Matthew S. Bothner United States
Jonathan Lavelle Ireland
Mary M. Maloney United States
Sarah MacCurtain Ireland
Brian D’Netto Australia
Ingo Forstenlechner relative to Verner Worm Denmark Verner Worm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Verner Worm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Forstenlechner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Forstenlechner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Forstenlechner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Forstenlechner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Forstenlechner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Forstenlechner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Forstenlechner. The network helps show where Ingo Forstenlechner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Ingo Forstenlechner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingo Forstenlechner Line = papers co-authored together Ingo Forstenlechner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010104
2 2010104
3 201073
4 201164
5 201164
6 200853
7 201353
8 200950
9 201245
10 201435
11 201135
12 200634
13 200933
14 201033
15 201725
16 200725
17 201019
18 201017
19 201316
20 201015

About Ingo Forstenlechner

Ingo Forstenlechner is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Accounting, Strategy and Management and Gender Studies, having authored 29 papers that have together received 963 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Socioeconomic Development in MENA (17 papers), Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (9 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (7 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (6 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (4 papers), International Business and FDI (3 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (230 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (173 citations), Sociology and Political Science (639 citations), Gender Studies (130 citations) and Strategy and Management (192 citations). Ingo Forstenlechner has collaborated with scholars based in United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Emilie Rutledge, Mohammed A. Al‐Waqfi, Kamel Mellahi, Fiona Lettice, Yehuda Baruch, Mohamed T. Madi, Hassan M. Selim, Mustafa F. Özbilgin, Baker Ahmad Alserhan and Kevin Schoepp. Their work appears in journals such as Personnel Review, Employee Relations, Middle East Policy, Career Development International and The International Journal of Human Resource Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact