G.A. Blok

19 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

G.A. Blok
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Family Practice 33
  • Transplantation 27
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 264
  • Clinical Psychology 149
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 18
Replace Hannah Maple with:
Hannah Maple United Kingdom
Jeffrey P. Spike United States
Sofie Vandenbroeck Belgium
Neide da Silva Knihs Brazil
Kim M. McCormick Canada
Henry Pohl United States
Jordan Gilleland United States
Shayna S. Coburn United States
Wendy Dean United States
Bill Irish United Kingdom
G.A. Blok relative to Hannah Maple United Kingdom Hannah Maple's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Hannah Maple · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.A. Blok

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.A. Blok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.A. Blok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.A. Blok more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.A. Blok

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.A. Blok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.A. Blok. The network helps show where G.A. Blok may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G.A. Blok, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.A. Blok Line = papers co-authored together G.A. Blok links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201267
2 199946
3 199946
4 200033
5 200428
6 200825
7 199915
8 200611
9 200411
10
Overview of the European Donor Hospital Education Program.
19968
11 20058
12 20196
13 20066
14
An online summer course for prospective international students to remediate deficiencies in Math prior knowledge: the case of ALEKS
20066
15 19955
16
Online bijspijkeronderwijs in de praktijk
20052
17 20182
18 19992
19
Dealing with Grief and Requesting Donation an International Challenge
20061

About G.A. Blok

G.A. Blok is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Surgery and Family Practice, having authored 19 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Donation and Transplantation (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (9 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers) and Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (33 citations), Transplantation (27 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (264 citations), Clinical Psychology (149 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (18 citations). G.A. Blok has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include M. Morley, Jan van Dalen, Dason Evans, Celia Wight, Kitty J. Jager, Bernard Cohen, Cees van der Vleuten, C. Reid, G. Kootstra and Jouke van der Zee. Their work appears in journals such as Transplant International, Advances in Health Sciences Education, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, BMC Health Services Research and Anaesthesia and Intensive Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact