Esther de Groot

1.3k citations
82 papers · 819 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Esther de Groot

72 papers receiving 791 citations

Peers

Esther de Groot
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Family Practice 28
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 34
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 26
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 15
  • General Health Professions 165
Replace Helen Cameron with:
Helen Cameron United Kingdom
Scheltus J. van Luijk Netherlands
Rylan Egan Canada
Wai‐Ching Leung United Kingdom
Lex Frieden United States
Angela G. Brega United States
Patricia Gonce Morton United States
Stephanie Archer United Kingdom
Timothy R. Brown United States
Ilene L. Hollin United States
Esther de Groot relative to Helen Cameron United Kingdom Helen Cameron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Helen Cameron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Esther de Groot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Esther de Groot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Esther de Groot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Esther de Groot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Esther de Groot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Esther de Groot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Esther de Groot. The network helps show where Esther de Groot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Esther de Groot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Esther de Groot Line = papers co-authored together Esther de Groot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201753
2 201848
3 200340
4 202133
5 201830
6 201430
7 201530
8 201627
9 201826
10 201926
11 201924
12 201924
13 201322
14 201918
15 201217
16 201115
17 201215
18 201615
19 201814
20 202013

About Esther de Groot

Esther de Groot is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, Emergency Medicine and Family Practice, having authored 82 papers that have together received 819 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (12 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (6 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (4 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (28 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (34 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (26 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (15 citations) and General Health Professions (165 citations). Esther de Groot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roger Damoiseaux, Dorien Zwart, Frans H. Rutten, Debbie Jaarsma, Peter van Beukelen, Elke De Valck, Raymond Cluydts, Maaike Endedijk, Peter Pype and Arno W. Hoes. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, BMJ Open, Medical Teacher, BJGP Open and Perspectives on Medical Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact