Emily Treen

818 citations
19 papers · 500 · 1 hit paper · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Emily Treen

19 papers receiving 472 citations

Emily Treen's Hit Papers

Artificial Intelligence in Advertising 2018 · 269 citations
2690+2+5Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Emily Treen
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Marketing 139
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 15
  • Information Systems and Management 64
  • Health Informatics 10
  • Communication 46
Replace Anjali Bal with:
Anjali Bal United States
Neil Bendle Canada
Zsófia Tóth United Kingdom
Chen‐Ya Wang Taiwan
Paige Rutner United States
Tyge‐F. Kummer Australia
Junsong Chen China
Udo Gottlieb Australia
Sladjana Nørskov Denmark
Fulya Açikgöz United Kingdom
Emily Treen relative to Anjali Bal United States Anjali Bal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Anjali Bal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Treen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Treen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Treen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Treen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Treen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Treen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Treen. The network helps show where Emily Treen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Emily Treen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Treen Line = papers co-authored together Emily Treen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
Artificial Intelligence in Advertising
Hit paper breakdown →
2018269
2 201641
3 201830
4 201622
5 201622
6 201618
7 201613
8 201812
9 201710
10 20219
11 20219
12 20228
13 20167
14 20207
15 20166
16 20176
17 20235
18 20174
19 20192

About Emily Treen

Emily Treen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Communication and Strategy and Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (8 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (6 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (6 papers), Management and Marketing Education (3 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (2 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (2 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (2 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (139 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (15 citations), Information Systems and Management (64 citations), Health Informatics (10 citations) and Communication (46 citations). Emily Treen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jan Kietzmann, Jeannette Paschen, Leyland Pitt, Pierre Berthon, Ian P. McCarthy, Jeremy de Beer, Christine Pitt, Michael R. Johnson, Amir Dabirian and Christina Atanasova. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Strategic Marketing, Business Horizons, Journal of Marketing Education, Journal of Advertising Research and Industrial Marketing Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact