Éamonn Slevin

51 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Éamonn Slevin
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Research and Theory 67
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 138
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 30
  • Clinical Psychology 430
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 403
Replace Mary Chambers with:
Mary Chambers United Kingdom
Annette Huntington New Zealand
Phyllis Montgomery Canada
Patricia L. Munhall United States
Danuta Wojnar United States
Gordon Grant United Kingdom
Carol Haigh United Kingdom
Valerie Fleming United Kingdom
R Davidhizar United States
Cynthia Baker Canada
Éamonn Slevin relative to Mary Chambers United Kingdom Mary Chambers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Mary Chambers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Éamonn Slevin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Éamonn Slevin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Éamonn Slevin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Éamonn Slevin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Éamonn Slevin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Éamonn Slevin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Éamonn Slevin. The network helps show where Éamonn Slevin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Éamonn Slevin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Éamonn Slevin Line = papers co-authored together Éamonn Slevin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003142
2 2013109
3 2000103
4 201374
5 199673
6 201371
7 200869
8 201351
9 200045
10 201238
11 199937
12 200936
13 201331
14 199927
15 200825
16 200223
17 199522
18 201221
19 200420
20 201617

About Éamonn Slevin

Éamonn Slevin is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education and Emergency Medicine, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Disability Support Research (14 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (8 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (8 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (5 papers), Nursing education and management (4 papers) and Disability Education and Employment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (67 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (138 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (30 citations), Clinical Psychology (430 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (403 citations). Éamonn Slevin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Laurence Taggart, Owen Doody, David Sines, Maria Truesdale‐Kennedy, Roy McConkey, Assumpta Ryan, Michael McKeon, Brendan McCormack, Patricia A. Fleming and Owen Barr. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Nursing, Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Nurse Education Today and Journal of Intellectual Disability Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact