David Sines

41 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

David Sines
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Research and Theory 9
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 8
  • General Health Professions 120
  • Clinical Psychology 101
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 6
Replace Judith Globerman with:
Judith Globerman Canada
Elisabet Cedersund Sweden
Diana Keatinge Australia
Dorothy Horsburgh United Kingdom
Laurene Sheilds Canada
David Seedhouse New Zealand
Tonia Crawford Australia
Leslie Graham Canada
Ester Carolina Apesoa‐Varano United States
Deborah Cullen United States
David Sines relative to Judith Globerman Canada Judith Globerman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Judith Globerman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Sines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Sines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Sines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Sines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Sines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Sines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Sines. The network helps show where David Sines may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside David Sines, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Sines Line = papers co-authored together David Sines links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000106
2 199673
3 200729
4 201227
5
Community and Public Health Nursing
201321
6 200420
7 199419
8 201212
9 199811
10 199611
11 200710
12
How nursing support staff contribute to care.
20127
13
Caring for mentally handicapped people in the community
19857
14 20077
15 20077
16 19957
17 19996
18 19976
19 19996
20 19936

About David Sines

David Sines is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 47 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (9 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (3 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (9 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (8 citations), General Health Professions (120 citations), Clinical Psychology (101 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (6 citations). David Sines has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Éamonn Slevin, Mark Whiting, Owen Barr, Steve McNally, A. LONG, Roger Ellis, Jane Wright, Fintan Sheerin, Ann Long and Andrew Bailey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Journal of Clinical Nursing and Nurse Researcher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact