Journal of Intellectual Disabilities

10.2k citations
737 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities

648 papers receiving 9.3k citations

Peers

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Safety Research 1.9k
  • Clinical Psychology 3.9k
  • Occupational Therapy 450
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2.4k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
Replace Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities with:
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities United States
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development United States
Journal of Disability Policy Studies United States
American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities United States
Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health United Kingdom
Intellectual and developmental disabilities United States
Journal of rehabilitation United States
Tizard Learning Disability Review United Kingdom
Sexuality and Disability United States
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research Sweden
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities relative to Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities United States Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Intellectual Disabilities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Intellectual Disabilities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Intellectual Disabilities more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Intellectual Disabilities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Intellectual Disabilities.

About Journal of Intellectual Disabilities

The 737 papers published in Journal of Intellectual Disabilities in the last decades have received a total of 10.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Intellectual Disabilities usually cover Safety Research (193 papers), Clinical Psychology (349 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (231 papers), Occupational Therapy (31 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (83 papers) specifically the topics of Family and Disability Support Research (296 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (214 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (106 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (103 papers), Disability Education and Employment (98 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (85 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (56 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Intellectual Disabilities are Roy McConkey, Gary Byrne, Penny Standen, Alinda Gillott, Laurence Taggart, Dan Goodley, Richard P. Hastings, John Rose, Edel Tierney and Owen Doody.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact