Jane V. Appleton

86 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Jane V. Appleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 57
  • Family Practice 39
  • Research and Theory 55
  • General Health Professions 335
  • Speech and Hearing 52
Replace Rebecca Barnes with:
Rebecca Barnes United Kingdom
Michela Rimondini Italy
Kendra L. Rieger Canada
Karen Hoare New Zealand
Colleen M. Fisher Australia
Cheryl Forchuk Canada
Diana Baptiste United States
Reidar Pedersen Norway
Wendy C. Y. Hu Australia
Jason M. Etchegaray United States
Jane V. Appleton relative to Rebecca Barnes United Kingdom Rebecca Barnes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Rebecca Barnes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane V. Appleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane V. Appleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane V. Appleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane V. Appleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane V. Appleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane V. Appleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane V. Appleton. The network helps show where Jane V. Appleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane V. Appleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane V. Appleton Line = papers co-authored together Jane V. Appleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995184
2 200291
3 199783
4 200067
5 199763
6 201756
7 199746
8 200643
9 202139
10 201637
11 201235
12 201132
13 201732
14 199630
15 200726
16 199725
17 201224
18 201924
19 199423
20 200423

About Jane V. Appleton

Jane V. Appleton is a scholar working on Safety Research, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Administration and Clinical Psychology, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Welfare and Adoption (25 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (17 papers), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (15 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (15 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (13 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Applications (5 papers), Legal and Social Justice Studies (5 papers) and School Health and Nursing Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (57 citations), Family Practice (39 citations), Research and Theory (55 citations), General Health Professions (335 citations) and Speech and Hearing (52 citations). Jane V. Appleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Lindy King, Sarah Cowley, Catherine Powell, Debra W. Jackson, Catherine L. Henshall, Lindsey Coombes, Eija Paavilainen, Peter D. Sidebotham, Luci D. Wiggs and Caroline Bradbury‐Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse Review, Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Health & Social Care in the Community and Journal of research in nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact