Jane V. Appleton

86 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jane V. Appleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Research and Theory 34
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 47
  • Clinical Psychology 342
  • General Health Professions 365
  • Health 91
Replace Michela Rimondini with:
Michela Rimondini Italy
Stephanie Short Australia
V. Susan Dahinten Canada
Karen Hoare New Zealand
Ruth Ludwick United States
Sarah Yardley United Kingdom
EunSeok Cha United States
Aysegul Gozu United States
Emma‐Louise Aveling United Kingdom
Wantana Maneesriwongul Thailand
Jane V. Appleton relative to Michela Rimondini Italy Michela Rimondini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Michela Rimondini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane V. Appleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane V. Appleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane V. Appleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane V. Appleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane V. Appleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane V. Appleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane V. Appleton. The network helps show where Jane V. Appleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane V. Appleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane V. Appleton Line = papers co-authored together Jane V. Appleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995203
2 200291
3 199785
4 200073
5 199767
6 201752
7 200645
8 201636
9 202135
10 201232
11 199631
12 201131
13 201730
14 200726
15 200425
16 199725
17 199423
18 201222
19 201922
20 202221

About Jane V. Appleton

Jane V. Appleton is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Health, having authored 97 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (40 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (15 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (14 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (10 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (9 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (7 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (6 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (34 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (47 citations), Clinical Psychology (342 citations), General Health Professions (365 citations) and Health (91 citations). Jane V. Appleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lindy King, Sarah Cowley, Debra Jackson, Catherine Powell, Catherine Henshall, Lindsey Coombes, Eija Paavilainen, Peter Sidebotham, Caroline Bradbury‐Jones and Maria Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse Review, Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Health & Social Care in the Community and Journal of research in nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact