Jane V. Appleton

83 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jane V. Appleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Research and Theory 34
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 47
  • Clinical Psychology 334
  • General Health Professions 346
  • Health 88
Replace Megan‐Jane Johnstone with:
Megan‐Jane Johnstone Australia
Michela Rimondini Italy
V. Susan Dahinten Canada
Stephanie Short Australia
Ruth Ludwick United States
Karen Hoare New Zealand
Sarah Yardley United Kingdom
Maura Galletta Italy
EunSeok Cha United States
Aysegul Gozu United States
Jane V. Appleton relative to Megan‐Jane Johnstone Australia Megan‐Jane Johnstone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Megan‐Jane Johnstone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane V. Appleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane V. Appleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane V. Appleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane V. Appleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane V. Appleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane V. Appleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane V. Appleton. The network helps show where Jane V. Appleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane V. Appleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane V. Appleton Line = papers co-authored together Jane V. Appleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995198
2 200286
3 199782
4 200071
5 199765
6 201752
7 200645
8 201635
9 202133
10 201232
11 199631
12 201129
13 201729
14 200726
15 200425
16 199724
17 201222
18 201922
19 202221
20 199420

About Jane V. Appleton

Jane V. Appleton is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Health, having authored 93 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (39 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (14 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (14 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (9 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (9 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (7 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (6 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (34 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (47 citations), Clinical Psychology (334 citations), General Health Professions (346 citations) and Health (88 citations). Jane V. Appleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lindy King, Sarah Cowley, Debra Jackson, Catherine Powell, Catherine Henshall, Lindsey Coombes, Eija Paavilainen, Peter Sidebotham, Caroline Bradbury‐Jones and Luci Wiggs. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse Review, Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Health & Social Care in the Community and Journal of research in nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact