Nancy Drew

14 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Nancy Drew's Hit Papers

Reflective Lifeworld Research 2001 · 743 citations
7430+8+16Years since publication200400600

Peers

Nancy Drew
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Research and Theory 78
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 24
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 78
  • General Health Professions 307
  • Clinical Psychology 261
Replace Patricia L. Munhall with:
Patricia L. Munhall United States
Joanne Olson Canada
Saras Henderson Australia
Richard H. Steeves United States
Ruth Ludwick United States
Kerstin Segesten Sweden
Annelie J. Sundler Sweden
Shirley M. Solberg Canada
Wendy Austin Canada
Danuta Wojnar United States
Nancy Drew relative to Patricia L. Munhall United States Patricia L. Munhall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Patricia L. Munhall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Drew. The network helps show where Nancy Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy Drew Line = papers co-authored together Nancy Drew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
Reflective Lifeworld Research
Hit paper breakdown →
2001743
2 198699
3 199771
4 200067
5 198954
6 199345
7 199535
8 200129
9 200425
10 200224
11 199719
12 200810
13 19916
14 20062
15 19741

About Nancy Drew

Nancy Drew is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Research and Theory, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (4 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (1 paper), Social Representations and Identity (1 paper) and Participatory Visual Research Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (78 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (24 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (78 citations), General Health Professions (307 citations) and Clinical Psychology (261 citations). Nancy Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karin Dahlberg, Maria Nyström, Gunilla Carlsson and Kim Lützén. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in Nursing Science, Journal of Holistic Nursing, Nursing Philosophy, Western Journal of Nursing Research and Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact