David Pariser
Impact in
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 0.5%
- Art Education and Development
- Music top 2%
- Diverse Music Education Insights
Papers in
-
- Art Education and Development 24
-
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience 15
- Co-authors
- Ellen Winner (1 shared paper)Gianni Vattimo (1 shared paper)Jon R. Snyder (1 shared paper)Axel van den Berg (6 shared papers)Enid Zimmerman (2 shared papers)Susan M. Rostan (1 shared paper)Howard E. Gruber (1 shared paper)Rudolf Arnheim (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Studies in Art Education (13 papers)Leonardo (4 papers)Art Education (3 papers)Arts Education Policy Review (1 paper)High Ability Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesHong Kong
In The Last Decade
David Pariser
36 papers receiving 387 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 216
- Music 61
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 211
- Museology 19
- Conservation 15
Countries citing papers authored by David Pariser
This map shows the geographic impact of David Pariser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Pariser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Pariser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Pariser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Pariser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Pariser. The network helps show where David Pariser may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside David Pariser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 137 | |
| 2 | 1989 | 97 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 50 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1983 | 31 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 27 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 16 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1979 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 17 | Does Practice Make Perfect? Children's and Adults' Constructions of Graphic Merit and Development: A Crosscultural Study | 2007 | 6 |
| 18 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 6 |
About David Pariser
David Pariser is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Music, Museology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 40 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art Education and Development (24 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (15 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (7 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (6 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (4 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (3 papers), Educational Environments and Student Outcomes (3 papers) and Digital Storytelling and Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (216 citations), Music (61 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (211 citations), Museology (19 citations) and Conservation (15 citations). David Pariser has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Winner, Gianni Vattimo, Jon R. Snyder, Axel van den Berg, Enid Zimmerman, Susan M. Rostan, Howard E. Gruber, Rudolf Arnheim and Judith A. Boss. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Art Education, Leonardo, Art Education, Arts Education Policy Review and High Ability Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.