Studies in Art Education

1.7k papers and 19.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Studies in Art Education in the last decades have received a total of 19.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in Art Education usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (1.3k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (294 papers) and Education (291 papers) specifically the topics of Art Education and Development (1.2k papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (258 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (254 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in Art Education are James J. Gibson, Elliot W. Eisner, Emily Eisner, J. A. Muir Gray, Paul Duncum, Arthur D. Efland, W. Lambert Brittain, Kerry Freedman, Ralph A. Smith and J. Thomas Hastings.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in Art Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in Art Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in Art Education.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in Art Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in Art Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in Art Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in Art Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025