CALICO Journal

About

The 906 papers published in CALICO Journal in the last decades have received a total of 13.6k indexed citations. Papers published in CALICO Journal usually cover Language and Linguistics (463 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (251 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (249 papers) specifically the topics of EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (385 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (201 papers) and Second Language Acquisition and Learning (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in CALICO Journal are Mark Warschauer, Philip Hubbard, Jack Burston, Yong Zhao, Lina Lee, Steven L. Thorne, Mark Darhower, Noriko Nagata, Julie M. Sykes and Eiko Ushida.

In The Last Decade

CALICO Journal

695 papers receiving 10.7k citations

Fields of papers published in CALICO Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in CALICO Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in CALICO Journal.

Countries where authors publish in CALICO Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in CALICO Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in CALICO Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CALICO Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026