David Barnes

68 papers receiving 933 citations

Peers

David Barnes
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • Family Practice 46
  • Physiology 124
  • Developmental Neuroscience 57
  • Algebra and Number Theory 48
  • Geometry and Topology 71
Replace Martin A. Denvir with:
Martin A. Denvir United Kingdom
D. R. Abramovich United Kingdom
Richard Davenport United Kingdom
W L Heinrichs United States
Noriyuki Takahashi Japan
Sara R. Zwart United States
Sean P. Kelly United States
Rita Massa Italy
Minh Bui Australia
Damir Sapunar Croatia
David Barnes relative to Martin A. Denvir United Kingdom Martin A. Denvir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Martin A. Denvir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Barnes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Barnes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Barnes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Barnes. The network helps show where David Barnes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Barnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Barnes Line = papers co-authored together David Barnes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999168
2 1971102
3 200582
4 197379
5 197367
6 201352
7 199644
8 201529
9 199727
10 201727
11
The ten-year experience of firework injuries treated at a uk regional burns & plastic surgery unit.
201822
12
The Use Of Dermal Regeneration Templates For Primary Burns Surgery In A UK Regional Burns Centre.
202019
13 199116
14 202014
15 201313
16 201513
17 201912
18 202112
19 199011
20 200010

About David Barnes

David Barnes is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Epidemiology, Algebra and Number Theory and Education, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (17 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (17 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (9 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (8 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (6 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (4 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (3 papers) and Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (46 citations), Physiology (124 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (57 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (48 citations) and Geometry and Topology (71 citations). David Barnes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Altman, Sue Barnes, Nancy D. Denslow, Marius Brouwer, Shannon D. Manning, Peter Dziewulski, Gopal D. Das, Kiran Sudarshan, Andrèa M. Hodge and Juergen Biener. Their work appears in journals such as Burns, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Water Science & Technology, Journal of Burn Care & Research and Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact