Peter Bliss
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Radiation top 5%
- Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Papers in
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 4
-
- Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques 3
- Co-authors
- A. Gregor (1 shared paper)Gillian Kerr (1 shared paper)Peter Blake (2 shared papers)Christina Aquino Parsons (1 shared paper)Valerie J. Cowie (1 shared paper)Peter A. Trott (1 shared paper)Ellen M. Donovan (1 shared paper)Jamie Fairfoul (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Radiology (2 papers)Clinical Oncology (2 papers)Radiotherapy and Oncology (2 papers)The Lancet (1 paper)The Lancet Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Peter Bliss
15 papers receiving 920 citations
Peter Bliss's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Cancer Research 554
- Radiation 178
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 38
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 80
- Oncology 56
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bliss
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bliss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bliss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bliss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bliss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bliss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bliss. The network helps show where Peter Bliss may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Peter Bliss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partial-breast radiotherapy after breast conservation surgery for patients with early breast cancer (UK IMPORT LOW trial): 5-year results from a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 459 |
| 2 | 2020 | 213 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 64 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 55 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1970 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 1 |
About Peter Bliss
Peter Bliss is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Radiation, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 948 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (1 paper), Management of metastatic bone disease (1 paper), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (1 paper) and Effects of Radiation Exposure (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (554 citations), Radiation (178 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (38 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (80 citations) and Oncology (56 citations). Peter Bliss has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include A. Gregor, Gillian Kerr, Peter Blake, Christina Aquino Parsons, Valerie J. Cowie, Peter A. Trott, Ellen M. Donovan, Jamie Fairfoul, Isabel Syndikus and Joana Carvalho Vasconcelos. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Radiology, Clinical Oncology, Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Lancet and The Lancet Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.