John K. Beem

2.0k citations
50 papers · 709 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

John K. Beem

50 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers

John K. Beem
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Applied Mathematics 326
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 454
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 280
  • Geometry and Topology 148
  • Mathematical Physics 94
Replace Hung-Hsi Wu with:
Hung-Hsi Wu United States
E. Minguzzi Italy
Dmitri V. Alekseevsky United Kingdom
Paul E. Ehrlich United States
Reese Harvey United States
Hajime Urakawa Japan
Maryam Mirzakhani United States
E. H. Kronheimer United Kingdom
Hirohiko Shima Japan
H. E. Rauch United States
John K. Beem relative to Hung-Hsi Wu United States Hung-Hsi Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Hung-Hsi Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John K. Beem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John K. Beem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John K. Beem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John K. Beem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John K. Beem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John K. Beem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John K. Beem. The network helps show where John K. Beem may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside John K. Beem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John K. Beem Line = papers co-authored together John K. Beem links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017164
2 197061
3 198336
4 197630
5 199727
6 197626
7 198525
8 197024
9 197822
10 199420
11 198520
12 198919
13 197916
14 198713
15 198413
16 197613
17 197912
18 197912
19 198810
20 199010

About John K. Beem

John K. Beem is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Applied Mathematics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mathematical Physics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 709 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (22 papers), Advanced Differential Geometry Research (22 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (20 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (13 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (5 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (4 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (3 papers) and Relativity and Gravitational Theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (326 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (454 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (280 citations), Geometry and Topology (148 citations) and Mathematical Physics (94 citations). John K. Beem has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Paul E. Ehrlich, Kevin L. Easley, Phillip E. Parker, Robert E. Reys, Ira J. Papick, Bárbara J. Reys, Steen Markvorsen, David Barnes, Steven G. Harris and Gregory J. Galloway. Their work appears in journals such as General Relativity and Gravitation, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education and Communications in Mathematical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact