Geometry and Topology

475.8k papers and 5.9M indexed citations

About

475.8k papers covering Geometry and Topology have received a total of 5.9M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Algebraic structures and combinatorial models, Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory and Advanced Topics in Algebra and also cover the fields of Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory and Applied Mathematics. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Mathematical Physics, Applied Mathematics and Computational Theory and Mathematics. Some of the most active scholars covering Geometry and Topology are George Paxinos, Fred L. Bookstein, Christian Peter Klingenberg, Pranab Kumar Sen, Edward Witten, John Milnor, Victor G. Kač, F. James Rohlf, Karl Friston and Jean-Pierre Serre.

In The Last Decade

Geometry and Topology

42.3k papers receiving 194.1k citations

Fields of papers citing papers about Geometry and Topology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Geometry and Topology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Geometry and Topology.

Countries where authors publish papers about Geometry and Topology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Geometry and Topology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Geometry and Topology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geometry and Topology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026