Mathematical Physics

504.1k papers and 6.8M indexed citations

About

504.1k papers covering Mathematical Physics have received a total of 6.8M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Numerical methods in inverse problems, Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals and Advanced Algebra and Geometry and also cover the fields of Geometry and Topology, Applied Mathematics and Computational Theory and Mathematics. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Some of the most active scholars covering Mathematical Physics are Joseph Felsenstein, Tosio Kato, Per Christian Hansen, Barry Simon, Edward Witten, Peter Grassberger, Jean Bourgain, David Ruelle, Lars Hörmander and G. Lusztig.

In The Last Decade

Mathematical Physics

42.6k papers receiving 181.8k citations

Fields of papers citing papers about Mathematical Physics

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Mathematical Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Mathematical Physics.

Countries where authors publish papers about Mathematical Physics

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Mathematical Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Mathematical Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathematical Physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers covering Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Breakdown of academic impact, for papers covering Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality Breakdown of academic impact, for papers covering General Economics, Econometrics and Finance Breakdown of academic impact, for papers covering Applied Mathematics Breakdown of academic impact, for papers covering Geometry and Topology Breakdown of academic impact, for papers covering Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Breakdown of academic impact, for papers covering Media Technology