Algebra and Number Theory

217.4k papers and 2.4M indexed citations i.

About

217.4k papers covering Algebra and Number Theory have received a total of 2.4M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Advanced Topics in Algebra, Algebraic structures and combinatorial models and Rings, Modules, and Algebras and also cover the fields of Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics. Some of the most active scholars covering Algebra and Number Theory are Victor G. Kač, David Eisenbud, Joseph H. Silverman, George E. Andrews, Jean-Pierre Serre, Richard P. Stanley, Michio Jimbo, G. Lusztig, Alain Connes and Daniel Quillen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Algebra and Number Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Algebra and Number Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Algebra and Number Theory.

Countries where authors publish papers about Algebra and Number Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Algebra and Number Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Algebra and Number Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Algebra and Number Theory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025