Danielle Moore

25 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers

Danielle Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 17
  • Health 90
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 23
  • General Health Professions 132
  • Toxicology 16
Replace Jennifer Wenborn with:
Jennifer Wenborn United Kingdom
Soledad Argüelles United States
Jean Vézina Canada
Alisa A. O’Riley United States
Anne‐Nicole Casey Australia
Anna Kågström Czechia
Trinidad Argüelles United States
Renèe Pepin United States
Kathleen Kim United States
Tomáš Formánek Czechia
Danielle Moore relative to Jennifer Wenborn United Kingdom Jennifer Wenborn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Jennifer Wenborn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Moore. The network helps show where Danielle Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Moore Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018133
2 201478
3 201869
4 201943
5 201327
6 202026
7 201926
8 201625
9 201924
10 201622
11 201921
12 201518
13 201813
14 202112
15 20149
16 20207
17 20187
18
Overcoming the challenges of translating mental health instruments into sign languages
20136
19 20203
20 20143

About Danielle Moore

Danielle Moore is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 27 papers that have together received 578 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (2 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers) and Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (17 citations), Health (90 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (23 citations), General Health Professions (132 citations) and Toxicology (16 citations). Danielle Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Hanratty, Nicole Valtorta, Daniel Stow, Lynn L. Barron, Fiona E. Matthews, Barry Wright, Lieve Van den Block, Katherine Froggatt, Victoria Allgar and Katarzyna Szczerbińska. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Age and Ageing, American Journal of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact