Anna Kågström

26 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers

Anna Kågström
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 33
  • Health 166
  • Clinical Psychology 292
  • Applied Psychology 50
  • Social Psychology 166
Replace Tomáš Formánek with:
Tomáš Formánek Czechia
Sarah T. Stahl United States
Renèe Pepin United States
Ines Conrad Germany
Alisa A. O’Riley United States
Darío Moreno‐Agostino United Kingdom
Stephanie Schrempft Switzerland
Floor Holvast Netherlands
Sandra Kraemer United States
José Guzmán‐Parra Spain
Anna Kågström relative to Tomáš Formánek Czechia Tomáš Formánek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tomáš Formánek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Kågström

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Kågström's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Kågström with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Kågström more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Kågström

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Kågström. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Kågström. The network helps show where Anna Kågström may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Kågström, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Kågström Line = papers co-authored together Anna Kågström links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020138
2 2019115
3 201854
4 202151
5 201938
6 201936
7 201932
8 202031
9 202116
10 202214
11 202112
12 202212
13
Adherence to the Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities in Czech Psychiatric Hospitals: A Nationwide Evaluation Study.
202012
14 202211
15 202210
16 20199
17 20238
18 20206
19 20235
20 20222

About Anna Kågström

Anna Kågström is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Health, General Health Professions and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 622 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (10 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (9 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (3 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (33 citations), Health (166 citations), Clinical Psychology (292 citations), Applied Psychology (50 citations) and Social Psychology (166 citations). Anna Kågström has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Petr Winkler, Pavla Čermáková, Tomáš Formánek, Karolína Mladá, Zuzana Mohrová, Pavel Mohr, Ladislav Csémy, Miloslav Kopeček, Dag Aarsland and Lucie Bankovská Motlová. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, Scientific Reports, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Adolescent Research Review and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact