Fiona E. Matthews
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.05%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.1%
- Frailty in Older Adults
Papers in
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 141
- Health 36
- Health disparities and outcomes 36
- Co-authors
- Carol Brayne (229 shared papers)Paul G. Ince (50 shared papers)Sam Norton (6 shared papers)George M. Savva (33 shared papers)Stephen B. Wharton (39 shared papers)Deborah E. Barnes (1 shared paper)Kristine Yaffe (1 shared paper)Clare Bambra (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Age and Ageing (31 papers)International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (16 papers)Alzheimer s & Dementia (14 papers)BMC Geriatrics (13 papers)Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Fiona E. Matthews
357 papers receiving 24.3k citations
Fiona E. Matthews's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
- Psychiatry and Mental health 6.1k
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 1.2k
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 371
- Neurology 2.1k
- Health 1.6k
Countries citing papers authored by Fiona E. Matthews
This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona E. Matthews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona E. Matthews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona E. Matthews more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona E. Matthews
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona E. Matthews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona E. Matthews. The network helps show where Fiona E. Matthews may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fiona E. Matthews, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 368 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer's disease: an analysis of population-based data Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 1751 |
| 2 | The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 1240 |
| 3 | Age, Neuropathology, and Dementia Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 676 |
| 4 | A two-decade comparison of prevalence of dementia in individuals aged 65 years and older from three geographical areas of England: results of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study I and II Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 672 |
| 5 | Prevalence of autism-spectrum conditions: UK school-based population study Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 631 |
| 6 | The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 607 |
| 7 | The changing prevalence and incidence of dementia over time — current evidence Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 495 |
| 8 | White Matter Lesions in an Unselected Cohort of the Elderly Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 469 |
| 9 | Anticholinergic Medication Use and Cognitive Impairment in the Older Population: The Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 452 |
| 10 | A commentary on studies presenting projections of the future prevalence of dementia Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 450 |
| 11 | Continuing increase in mesothelioma mortality in Britain Hit paper breakdown → | 1995 | 433 |
| 12 | The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) study protocol: a cross-sectional, lifespan, multidisciplinary examination of healthy cognitive ageing Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 391 |
| 13 | 2010 | 379 | |
| 14 | Delirium is a strong risk factor for dementia in the oldest-old: a population-based cohort study Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 377 |
| 15 | 2005 | 342 | |
| 16 | Anticholinergic drugs and risk of dementia: case-control study Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 325 |
| 17 | 2008 | 318 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 305 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 294 | |
| 20 | Dementia in western Europe: epidemiological evidence and implications for policy making Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 285 |
About Fiona E. Matthews
Fiona E. Matthews is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Health, Physiology, General Health Professions and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 368 papers that have together received 25.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (141 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (36 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (27 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (16 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (15 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (12 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (6.1k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (1.2k citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (371 citations), Neurology (2.1k citations) and Health (1.6k citations). Fiona E. Matthews has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Carol Brayne, Paul G. Ince, Sam Norton, George M. Savva, Stephen B. Wharton, Deborah E. Barnes, Kristine Yaffe, Clare Bambra, John Ford and Ryan Riordan. Their work appears in journals such as Age and Ageing, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Alzheimer s & Dementia, BMC Geriatrics and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.