Caroline Doherty

28 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Caroline Doherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Immunology and Allergy 41
  • Family Practice 11
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
  • General Health Professions 77
Replace Ruth Crowe with:
Ruth Crowe United States
Marc Dooms Belgium
Yongyue Qi United States
Shiva Sarraf‐Yazdi United States
Elizabeth M. Long United States
Nathalie de Lourdes Souza Dewulf Brazil
Hongzhang Shen China
Anthony Colombo United States
Rosemary Claire Roden United States
Melissa Burger United States
Caroline Doherty relative to Ruth Crowe United States Ruth Crowe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ruth Crowe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Doherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Doherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Doherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Doherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Doherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Doherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Doherty. The network helps show where Caroline Doherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Doherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline Doherty Line = papers co-authored together Caroline Doherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008152
2 201952
3 201633
4 201925
5 202018
6 201518
7 201917
8 200917
9 201816
10 202316
11 201316
12 202214
13 20049
14 20179
15 20228
16 20228
17 20205
18 20224
19 20224
20 20253

About Caroline Doherty

Caroline Doherty is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Molecular Biology, Economics and Econometrics, Immunology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Roles and Practices (6 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (5 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (3 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (12 citations), Immunology and Allergy (41 citations), Family Practice (11 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations) and General Health Professions (77 citations). Caroline Doherty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include David J. Timson, John Nelson, Neil V. McFerran, David A. Steele, Kristina Staley, Esther H. Chang, Joe B. Harford, Sang Soo Kim, L. James Maher and Barbara Todd. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Bioscience Reports, Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Journal of Cardiac Failure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact