Countries where authors publish in Health Technology Assessment
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health Technology Assessment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health Technology Assessment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Technology Assessment more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Health Technology Assessment
This network shows the impact of papers published in Health Technology Assessment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health Technology Assessment.
About Health Technology Assessment
The 1.6k papers published in Health Technology Assessment in the last decades have received a total of 122.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Health Technology Assessment usually cover Gastroenterology (30 papers), Internal Medicine (17 papers), Otorhinolaryngology (17 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (121 papers) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (27 papers) specifically the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (97 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (21 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (21 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (20 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (20 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (18 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (17 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health Technology Assessment are Jonathan J Deeks, Jacqueline Dinnes, Norman Waugh, Mark Sculpher, Amanda Sowden, Emma Loveman, Luke Vale, Cynthia Fraser, A Fry-Smith and Andrew Clegg.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.