Danielle Cooper

1.8k citations
29 papers · 1.4k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Cooper

29 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Danielle Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 579
  • Strategy and Management 293
  • Social Psychology 233
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 88
  • Accounting 109
Replace Regina M. O’Neill with:
Regina M. O’Neill United States
John J. Gabarro United States
James K. Summers United States
Bret Bradley United States
Jason R. Pierce United States
Chung‐Leung Luk Hong Kong
Zachary Sheaffer Israel
Albert C. Y. Teo Singapore
Phyllis Anne Siegel United States
Danielle Cooper relative to Regina M. O’Neill United States Regina M. O’Neill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
Regina M. O’Neill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Cooper. The network helps show where Danielle Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Cooper Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010268
2 2019176
3 2014160
4 2013144
5 2018143
6 2013133
7 202066
8 201554
9 201344
10 201928
11 200824
12 201623
13 202018
14 201313
15 202213
16 202110
17 20119
18 20198
19 20237
20 20114

About Danielle Cooper

Danielle Cooper is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation and Strategy and Management, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (11 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (5 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (4 papers), Quality and Supply Management (2 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (2 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), International Business and FDI (1 paper) and Mentoring and Academic Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (579 citations), Strategy and Management (293 citations), Social Psychology (233 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (88 citations) and Accounting (109 citations). Danielle Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Pankaj C. Patel, Sherry M. B. Thatcher, Divesh Ojha, Chandan Acharya, Patricia Faison Hewlin, Laura Morgan Roberts, Brooke Renee Buckman, Erica L. Steckler, Hannes Leroy and Whitney O. Peake. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Management Decision, Journal of Small Business Management, Journal of Applied Psychology and Academy of Management Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact