Daniel C. Mathews

13 papers receiving 800 citations

Peers

Daniel C. Mathews
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Biological Psychiatry 409
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 95
  • Pharmacology 430
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 299
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 146
Replace Madonna Fasula with:
Madonna Fasula United States
Marc S. Lener United States
Jessica Stern United States
Nico Liebenberg Denmark
Phillip D. Kronstein United States
Craig A. Marquardt United States
Brooke Short Australia
Jose Franco‐Chaves United States
Lise T. Brennum Denmark
Shinn‐Won Lim South Korea
Daniel C. Mathews relative to Madonna Fasula United States Madonna Fasula's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Madonna Fasula · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Mathews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Mathews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Mathews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Mathews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Mathews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Mathews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Mathews. The network helps show where Daniel C. Mathews may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Mathews, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Mathews Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Mathews links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2012203
2 2012173
3 2013100
4 201375
5 201659
6 201254
7 201337
8 201335
9 201332
10 201328
11 201312
12 201411
13
NEUROBIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF SUICIDE AND SUICIDE ATTEMPTS IN BIPOLAR DISORDER Experimental Therapeutics
20131

About Daniel C. Mathews

Daniel C. Mathews is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 820 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (10 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (10 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (7 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1 paper) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (409 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (95 citations), Pharmacology (430 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (299 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (146 citations). Daniel C. Mathews has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Carlos A. Zarate, Ioline D. Henter, Dawn F. Ionescu, Erica M. Richards, Mark J. Niciu, David A. Luckenbaugh, Maura L. Furey, Craig A. Marquardt, Nancy E. Brutsché and Lobna Ibrahim. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, CNS Spectrums, Depression and Anxiety, Drugs and The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact