Cornelia Schoor

568 citations
25 papers · 434 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Cornelia Schoor

22 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

Cornelia Schoor
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 291
  • Computer Science Applications 92
  • Education 189
  • Communication 43
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 12
Replace Claire Scoular with:
Claire Scoular Australia
Márta Sobocinski Finland
Helmut Felix Friedrich Germany
Grégory Dyke United States
Amber Chauncey United States
Education and Learning: Development in Interaction Netherlands
Leerstoel van Gog Netherlands
Soniya Gadgil United States
Matthieu Quignard France
Sarah Manlove Netherlands
Cornelia Schoor relative to Claire Scoular Australia Claire Scoular's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Claire Scoular · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cornelia Schoor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cornelia Schoor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cornelia Schoor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cornelia Schoor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cornelia Schoor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cornelia Schoor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cornelia Schoor. The network helps show where Cornelia Schoor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Cornelia Schoor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cornelia Schoor Line = papers co-authored together Cornelia Schoor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012100
2 201586
3 201053
4 201928
5 201225
6 202021
7 201518
8 202118
9 201913
10 202010
11 202210
12 20218
13 20218
14 20197
15 20206
16 20206
17 20145
18 20224
19 20234
20 20232

About Cornelia Schoor

Cornelia Schoor is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education, Social Psychology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 25 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (14 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (11 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (4 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (3 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (291 citations), Computer Science Applications (92 citations), Education (189 citations), Communication (43 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (12 citations). Cornelia Schoor has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Maria Bannert, Susanne Narciss, Hermann Körndle, Cordula Artelt, Carolin Hahnel, Frank Goldhammer, Ulf Kroehne, Roland Brünken, Jean‐François Rouet and Astrid Schütz. Their work appears in journals such as Learning and Individual Differences, Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, European Journal of Psychology of Education, Reading and Writing and Lingua.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact