Clif Mims
Impact in
- Education top 2%
- Education and Technology Integration
- Online and Blended Learning
- Child Development and Digital Technology
Papers in
-
- Diverse Educational Innovations Studies 2
-
- Education and Technology Integration 3
- Teacher Education and Leadership Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Craig Erschel Shepherd (2 shared papers)Fethi Ahmet Inan (2 shared papers)Drew Polly (3 shared papers)Sang Hyun Kim (2 shared papers)Dennis Charsky (1 shared paper)Weidong Li (1 shared paper)Paul M. Wright (1 shared paper)Jeeheon Ryu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- TechTrends (4 papers)Teaching and Teacher Education (1 paper)Education and Information Technologies (1 paper)IGI Global eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Clif Mims
8 papers receiving 528 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Computer Science Applications 76
- Education 384
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 153
- Information Systems 281
- Gender Studies 105
Countries citing papers authored by Clif Mims
This map shows the geographic impact of Clif Mims's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clif Mims with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clif Mims more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clif Mims
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clif Mims. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clif Mims. The network helps show where Clif Mims may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Clif Mims, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 286 | |
| 2 | An Introduction to Current Trends and Benefits of Mobile Wireless Technology Use in Higher Education | 2006 | 157 |
| 3 | 2008 | 93 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 56 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 1 |
About Clif Mims
Clif Mims is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Computer Science Applications and Speech and Hearing, having authored 8 papers that have together received 614 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education and Technology Integration (3 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (2 papers), Mobile Learning in Education (2 papers), Health and Lifestyle Studies (1 paper), ICT in Developing Communities (1 paper), Teaching and Learning Programming (1 paper) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (76 citations), Education (384 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (153 citations), Information Systems (281 citations) and Gender Studies (105 citations). Clif Mims has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Craig Erschel Shepherd, Fethi Ahmet Inan, Drew Polly, Sang Hyun Kim, Dennis Charsky, Weidong Li, Paul M. Wright, Jeeheon Ryu, Stephanie A. Roberts and Stephanie Allen. Their work appears in journals such as TechTrends, Teaching and Teacher Education, Education and Information Technologies and IGI Global eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.