Chloé Amine

534 citations
7 papers · 433 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Proteins in Food Systems
    • Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
    • Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
    • Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis

Papers in

    • Proteins in Food Systems 4
    • Polysaccharides Composition and Applications 2
    • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation 2
    • Fluid Dynamics and Mixing 2

Chloé Amine

7 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers

Chloé Amine
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Food Science 302
  • Biomaterials 37
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 36
  • Materials Chemistry 102
  • Molecular Medicine 10
Replace U.S. van der Schaaf with:
U.S. van der Schaaf Germany
Tatiana Porto Santos Brazil
Afsaneh Taheri Iran
Laura Patricia Martínez‐Padilla Mexico
Lekshmi R. G. Kumar India
Meinou N. Corstens Netherlands
Nanik Purwanti Indonesia
Iveta Klojdová Czechia
Véronique Bosc France
O. Iglesias Spain
Chloé Amine relative to U.S. van der Schaaf Germany U.S. van der Schaaf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
U.S. van der Schaaf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chloé Amine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chloé Amine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloé Amine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloé Amine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chloé Amine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloé Amine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloé Amine. The network helps show where Chloé Amine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Chloé Amine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chloé Amine Line = papers co-authored together Chloé Amine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2014183
2 2017152
3 202154
4 201924
5 201713
6 20224
7 20203

About Chloé Amine

Chloé Amine is a scholar working on Food Science, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Forestry, having authored 7 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Proteins in Food Systems (4 papers), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (2 papers), Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization (2 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (2 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Mixing (2 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (1 paper), Protein purification and stability (1 paper) and Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (302 citations), Biomaterials (37 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (36 citations), Materials Chemistry (102 citations) and Molecular Medicine (10 citations). Chloé Amine has collaborated with scholars based in France, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thrandur Helgason, Tharwat F. Tadros, D. Renard, Peter A. Williams, Thierry Doco, Michaël Nigen, Adeline Boire, Mélanie Marquis, Claire Berton‐Carabin and Sébastien Marze. Their work appears in journals such as Food Hydrocolloids, Food Biophysics, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Micromachines.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact