Cheryl Brook

772 citations
29 papers · 546 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Cheryl Brook

25 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Cheryl Brook
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 312
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 49
  • Applied Psychology 42
  • Research and Theory 7
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 61
Replace Stein Amundsen with:
Stein Amundsen Norway
Shinhee Jeong United States
Milton Sousa Netherlands
Kamarul Zaman Ahmad United Arab Emirates
Guohong Han United States
R.W. Revans United Kingdom
Peter B. Vaill United States
Tyler Burch United States
John B. McGuire United States
Shaoping Qiu United States
Cheryl Brook relative to Stein Amundsen Norway Stein Amundsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Stein Amundsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Brook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Brook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Brook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Brook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Brook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Brook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Brook. The network helps show where Cheryl Brook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Cheryl Brook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheryl Brook Line = papers co-authored together Cheryl Brook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005218
2 201582
3 201248
4 202039
5 201435
6 201019
7 201614
8 201311
9 20219
10 20199
11 20179
12 20199
13 20217
14 20215
15 20105
16 20134
17 20134
18 20203
19 20133
20 20133

About Cheryl Brook

Cheryl Brook is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research, Education and Management Information Systems, having authored 29 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (20 papers), Organizational Learning and Leadership (14 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (3 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (3 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (3 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (312 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (49 citations), Applied Psychology (42 citations), Research and Theory (7 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (61 citations). Cheryl Brook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mike Pedler, John Burgoyne, Christine Abbott, Chandana Sanyal, Tom Bourner, C. H. Johnson, David Higgins, Clare Rigg, Kiran Trehan and George Boak. Their work appears in journals such as Action Learning Research and Practice, Human Relations, Management & Organizational History, Teaching in Higher Education and Human Resource Development International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact