Journal of Cardiac Failure

100.3k citations
5.9k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
    • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
    • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
    • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
    • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies

Papers in

    • Heart Failure Treatment and Management 1.6k
    • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors 717
    • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies 506
    • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies 193
    • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias 180

Journal of Cardiac Failure

4.5k papers receiving 76.2k citations

Peers

Journal of Cardiac Failure
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 54.5k
  • Family Practice 1.3k
  • Nephrology 3.6k
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 4.1k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 1.2k
Replace European Journal of Heart Failure with:
European Journal of Heart Failure United States
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology United States
Journal of the American Heart Association United States
Clinical Cardiology United States
Canadian Journal of Cardiology Canada
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases United States
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders China
Nature Reviews Cardiology United States
International Journal of Clinical Practice United Kingdom
Journal of Internal Medicine Sweden
Journal of Cardiac Failure relative to European Journal of Heart Failure United States European Journal of Heart Failure's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
European Journal of Heart Failure · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Cardiac Failure

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Cardiac Failure. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Cardiac Failure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Cardiac Failure more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Cardiac Failure

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Cardiac Failure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Cardiac Failure.

About Journal of Cardiac Failure

The 5.9k papers published in Journal of Cardiac Failure in the last decades have received a total of 100.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Cardiac Failure usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (3.2k papers), Family Practice (137 papers), Geriatrics and Gerontology (129 papers), Complementary and alternative medicine (221 papers) and Nephrology (187 papers) specifically the topics of Heart Failure Treatment and Management (1.6k papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (717 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (554 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (506 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (367 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (214 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (193 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (180 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Cardiac Failure are Heart Failure Society of America, Milton Packer, Gregg C. Fonarow, W.H. Wilson Tang, William T. Abraham, Jay N. Cohn, Christopher M. O’Connor, Douglas L. Mann, Biykem Bozkurt and Barry M. Massie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact