Bret Beheim

40 papers receiving 976 citations

Peers

Bret Beheim
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Aging 33
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 174
  • Social Psychology 157
  • Cultural Studies 60
  • Gender Studies 56
Replace Jeffrey Winking with:
Jeffrey Winking United States
Paul L. Hooper United States
Benjamin C. Trumble United States
Jonathan Stieglitz United States
Thomas S. Kraft United States
Lawrence S. Sugiyama United States
Rachel Morgan United States
Alexandra Alvergne United Kingdom
J. Colette Berbesque United States
Gillian R. Bentley United Kingdom
Bret Beheim relative to Jeffrey Winking United States Jeffrey Winking's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Jeffrey Winking · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bret Beheim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bret Beheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bret Beheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bret Beheim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bret Beheim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bret Beheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bret Beheim. The network helps show where Bret Beheim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bret Beheim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bret Beheim Line = papers co-authored together Bret Beheim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017104
2 202095
3 201586
4 201673
5 201668
6 201652
7 201649
8 201645
9 201439
10 201639
11 202138
12 201138
13 202132
14 201632
15 201428
16 201621
17 201721
18 202318
19 201117
20 202212

About Bret Beheim

Bret Beheim is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Gender Studies and General Health Professions, having authored 46 papers that have together received 998 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (14 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (10 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (6 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (5 papers), Language and cultural evolution (3 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (3 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (3 papers) and Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (33 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (174 citations), Social Psychology (157 citations), Cultural Studies (60 citations) and Gender Studies (56 citations). Bret Beheim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Michael Gurven, Hillard Kaplan, Jonathan Stieglitz, Benjamin C. Trumble, Aaron D. Blackwell, Paul L. Hooper, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Adrian V. Jaeggi, Helen Davis and Richard McElreath. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Evolutionary Human Sciences, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact