Anna Ziomkiewicz

42 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Anna Ziomkiewicz
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 380
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 48
  • Reproductive Medicine 111
  • Aging 22
  • Clinical Psychology 235
Replace William Day Lassek with:
William Day Lassek United States
Zohar Berman Israel
Ann F. Von Holle United States
Lindsay K. Matteson United States
Ruby L. Fried United States
Joy F. Stallings United States
Diana E. Peragine Canada
Barbara E. Thompson United Kingdom
Julie E. Yonker United States
Davidé Ponzi United States
Anna Ziomkiewicz relative to William Day Lassek United States William Day Lassek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
William Day Lassek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Ziomkiewicz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Ziomkiewicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Ziomkiewicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Ziomkiewicz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Ziomkiewicz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Ziomkiewicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Ziomkiewicz. The network helps show where Anna Ziomkiewicz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Ziomkiewicz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Ziomkiewicz Line = papers co-authored together Anna Ziomkiewicz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004309
2 200686
3 200684
4 200879
5 200568
6 200564
7 202162
8 201658
9 201357
10 201552
11 202250
12 201240
13 200630
14 200626
15 201219
16 202118
17 201617
18 201816
19 202416
20 201515

About Anna Ziomkiewicz

Anna Ziomkiewicz is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Nutrition and Dietetics and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (10 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (8 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (6 papers), Infant Nutrition and Health (4 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (4 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (3 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers) and Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (380 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (48 citations), Reproductive Medicine (111 citations), Aging (22 citations) and Clinical Psychology (235 citations). Anna Ziomkiewicz has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Grażyna Jasieńska, Inger Thune, Peter T. Ellison, Susan F. Lipson, Andrzej Galbarczyk, Richard G. Bribiescas, S. Lipson, Ilona Nenko, Szymon Wichary and Andrzej Pająk. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Human Biology, Scientific Reports, Personality and Individual Differences, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact