Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

808.6k citations
9.9k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

9.7k papers receiving 766.5k citations

Peers

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Ecological Modeling 28.5k
  • Developmental Biology 14.0k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 121.7k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 116.7k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 65.2k
Replace Scientific Reports with:
Scientific Reports China
Nature Communications United States
Journal of Experimental Biology United States
Current Biology United States
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences United States
Journal of Theoretical Biology United States
PLoS Biology United States
PLoS ONE United States
Biometrics United States
Animal Behaviour United States
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences relative to Scientific Reports China Scientific Reports's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Scientific Reports · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

About Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

The 9.9k papers published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 808.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences usually cover Developmental Biology (276 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.6k papers), Ecological Modeling (320 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k papers) and Paleontology (443 papers) specifically the topics of Plant and animal studies (754 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (690 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (540 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (473 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (462 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (420 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (385 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (332 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences are Karl Friston, Chris Frith, G. M. Hewitt, Barbara L. Fredrickson, António R. Damásio, Richard C. Thompson, Robert K. Colwell, Jonathan A. Coddington, Louis F. Reichardt and Mel Slater.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact