Daniel Redhead

20 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

Daniel Redhead
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 121
  • Safety Research 77
  • Sociology and Political Science 247
  • Social Psychology 110
  • Developmental Biology 8
Replace David Pietraszewski with:
David Pietraszewski Germany
Shakti Lamba United Kingdom
Qiao-Qiao He China
Karolina Sylwester United Kingdom
Nicole Naar United States
Matthew Zefferman United States
Daisuke Nakanishi Japan
Ryan Baldini United States
Cristina Moya United States
Laura Fortunato United Kingdom
Daniel Redhead relative to David Pietraszewski Germany David Pietraszewski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
David Pietraszewski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Redhead

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Redhead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Redhead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Redhead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Redhead

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Redhead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Redhead. The network helps show where Daniel Redhead may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Redhead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Redhead Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Redhead links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201878
2 201969
3 202243
4 202131
5 202127
6 202318
7 202314
8 202214
9 202412
10 202111
11 202310
12 20249
13 20239
14 20236
15
Rank Differentiation among Adolescent Hierarchies in Romanian State Care
20162
16 20222
17 20232
18 20251
19 20251
20 20251

About Daniel Redhead

Daniel Redhead is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (14 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (7 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers) and Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (121 citations), Safety Research (77 citations), Sociology and Political Science (247 citations), Social Psychology (110 citations) and Developmental Biology (8 citations). Daniel Redhead has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rick O’Gorman, Christopher von Rueden, Cody T. Ross, Joey T. Cheng, Eleanor A. Power, Charles Driver, Tom Foulsham, Hillard Kaplan, Michael Gurven and Richard McElreath. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Evolution and Human Behavior, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Methodological Innovations and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact