Daniel Redhead

26 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

Daniel Redhead
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 139
  • Safety Research 85
  • Social Psychology 129
  • Sociology and Political Science 276
  • Developmental Biology 9
Replace Shakti Lamba with:
Shakti Lamba United Kingdom
Tamás Dávid-Barrett United Kingdom
David Pietraszewski Germany
Karolina Sylwester United Kingdom
Nicole Naar United States
Matthew Zefferman United States
Ryan Baldini United States
Cristina Moya United States
Daisuke Nakanishi Japan
Qiao-Qiao He China
Daniel Redhead relative to Shakti Lamba United Kingdom Shakti Lamba's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.5×
Shakti Lamba · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Redhead

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Redhead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Redhead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Redhead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Redhead

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Redhead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Redhead. The network helps show where Daniel Redhead may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Redhead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Redhead Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Redhead links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201882
2 201975
3 202249
4 202131
5 202129
6 202324
7 202318
8 202215
9 202415
10 202314
11 202112
12 202311
13 202410
14 202310
15 20236
16 20184
17
Rank Differentiation among Adolescent Hierarchies in Romanian State Care
20163
18 20233
19 20183
20 20252

About Daniel Redhead

Daniel Redhead is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Safety Research and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (17 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (14 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (3 papers), Language and cultural evolution (2 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (139 citations), Safety Research (85 citations), Social Psychology (129 citations), Sociology and Political Science (276 citations) and Developmental Biology (9 citations). Daniel Redhead has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rick O’Gorman, Christopher von Rueden, Joey T. Cheng, Cody T. Ross, Eleanor A. Power, Charles Driver, Tom Foulsham, Michael Gurven, Hillard Kaplan and Richard McElreath. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution and Human Behavior, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Behavior Research Methods, PLoS Computational Biology and Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact