Daniel Major‐Smith

40 papers receiving 957 citations

Peers

Daniel Major‐Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 316
  • Social Psychology 278
  • Cultural Studies 104
  • Archeology 12
  • Safety Research 83
Replace Nikhil Chaudhary with:
Nikhil Chaudhary United Kingdom
Gül Deniz Salalι United Kingdom
Mark Dyble United Kingdom
James Thompson United Kingdom
Abigail E. Page United Kingdom
Catharine Cross United Kingdom
Sheina Lew‐Levy United Kingdom
Hillary N. Fouts United States
Lars Rodseth United States
Adam H. Boyette Germany
Daniel Major‐Smith relative to Nikhil Chaudhary United Kingdom Nikhil Chaudhary's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nikhil Chaudhary · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Major‐Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Major‐Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Major‐Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Major‐Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Major‐Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Major‐Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Major‐Smith. The network helps show where Daniel Major‐Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Major‐Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Major‐Smith Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Major‐Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017153
2 2016100
3 201676
4 202076
5 201768
6 201262
7 201660
8 201942
9 201641
10 201739
11 201838
12 202030
13 201529
14 201927
15 202219
16 201619
17 202016
18 201714
19 202213
20 20218

About Daniel Major‐Smith

Daniel Major‐Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Safety Research, having authored 45 papers that have together received 991 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (18 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (16 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (8 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Language and cultural evolution (2 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (316 citations), Social Psychology (278 citations), Cultural Studies (104 citations), Archeology (12 citations) and Safety Research (83 citations). Daniel Major‐Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Bamberg Migliano, Mark Dyble, Abigail E. Page, Nikhil Chaudhary, Gül Deniz Salalι, James Thompson, Ruth Mace, Lucio Vinicius, Sylvain Viguier and Katie Major-Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Evolutionary Human Sciences, Royal Society Open Science, PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Evolution and Human Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact