Ben Saunders
Impact in
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Papers in
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 22
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 8
- Political Theory and Influence 5
- Journals
- Bioethics (6 papers)Journal of Medical Ethics (6 papers)Res Publica (4 papers)Politics (4 papers)Utilitas (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Ben Saunders
48 papers receiving 481 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Political Science and International Relations 290
- Philosophy 99
- Cognitive Neuroscience 86
- Law 40
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 97
Countries citing papers authored by Ben Saunders
This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Saunders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Saunders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Saunders more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Saunders
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Saunders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Saunders. The network helps show where Ben Saunders may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Ben Saunders, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 60 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 11 | Do The Gods Wear Capes?: Spirituality, Fantasy, and Superheroes | 2011 | 17 |
| 12 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 8 |
About Ben Saunders
Ben Saunders is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Economics and Econometrics and Philosophy, having authored 59 papers that have together received 562 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (22 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (6 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (6 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (5 papers), Political Theory and Influence (5 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (290 citations), Philosophy (99 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (86 citations), Law (40 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (97 citations). Ben Saunders has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Phil Parvin and Alexander Paseau. Their work appears in journals such as Bioethics, Journal of Medical Ethics, Res Publica, Politics and Utilitas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.