Reproductive Medicine

464.7k papers and 11.0M indexed citations i.

About

464.7k papers covering Reproductive Medicine have received a total of 11.0M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Sperm and Testicular Function, Reproductive Biology and Fertility and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment and also cover the fields of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Molecular Biology. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology and Obstetrics and Gynecology. Some of the most active scholars covering Reproductive Medicine are R. John Aitken, Ashok Agarwal, Ryuzo Yanagimachi, Andrea Dunaif, Richard S. Legro, Linda C. Giudice, Ricardo Azziz, Allan E. Herbison, Stephen Franks and Donald W. Pfaff.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Reproductive Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Reproductive Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Reproductive Medicine.

Countries where authors publish papers about Reproductive Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Reproductive Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Reproductive Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reproductive Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025