Health Care Analysis

853 papers and 9.8k indexed citations

About

The 853 papers published in Health Care Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 9.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Health Care Analysis usually cover General Health Professions (408 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (205 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (172 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in medical practice (156 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (125 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health Care Analysis are Per‐Anders Tengland, Lennart Nordenfelt, Lars Sandman, Jeannette Pols, Stellan Welin, Pier Jaarsma, Christian Munthe, David B. Resnik, Tineke Abma and Tove Pettersen.

In The Last Decade

Health Care Analysis

695 papers receiving 8.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Health Care Analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Health Care Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health Care Analysis.

Countries where authors publish in Health Care Analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health Care Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health Care Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Care Analysis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026