Benő Csapó

3.5k citations
130 papers · 2.4k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Benő Csapó

106 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Benő Csapó
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 773
  • Computer Science Applications 230
  • Education 970
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 419
  • Safety Research 221
Replace Ou Lydia Liu with:
Ou Lydia Liu United States
Seth Chaiklin Denmark
Jay McTighe United States
Esther Care Australia
Johannes Hartig Germany
J.J. Beishuizen Netherlands
Andreas Schleicher France
Okhee Lee United States
Na’ilah Suad Nasir United States
Myint Swe Khine Australia
Benő Csapó relative to Ou Lydia Liu United States Ou Lydia Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Ou Lydia Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benő Csapó

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benő Csapó's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benő Csapó with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benő Csapó more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benő Csapó

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benő Csapó. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benő Csapó. The network helps show where Benő Csapó may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benő Csapó, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benő Csapó Line = papers co-authored together Benő Csapó links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998458
2 2014152
3 2013137
4 2019132
5 2013114
6 201184
7 199780
8 200774
9 201466
10 199854
11
Teaching and learning thinking skills
199945
12 201545
13 202043
14 201842
15 200342
16 201240
17 200939
18 201836
19 199835
20 202035

About Benő Csapó

Benő Csapó is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Geography, Planning and Development, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 130 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies (22 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (12 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (11 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (9 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (8 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (773 citations), Computer Science Applications (230 citations), Education (970 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (419 citations) and Safety Research (221 citations). Benő Csapó has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Gyöngyvér Molnár, Jennifer M. Bowes, Constance A. Flanagan, Britta Behrendt Jonsson, Samuel Greiff, Marianne Nikolov, Sascha Wüstenberg, Jarkko Hautamäki, Andreas G. Demetriou and Joachim Funke. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social Issues, Thinking Skills and Creativity, Frontiers in Psychology, Heliyon and Journal of Educational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact