Benjamin Radcliff

3.6k citations
66 papers · 2.4k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin Radcliff

61 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Benjamin Radcliff
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Health 382
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.2k
  • Public Administration 166
  • Social Psychology 660
  • Economics and Econometrics 602
Replace Andrew C. Eggers with:
Andrew C. Eggers United States
Tom van der Meer Netherlands
Charles N. Halaby United States
Peter Nannestad Denmark
Adrian Cherney Australia
Yotam Margalit Israel
Sonja Drobnič Germany
Greg A. Caldeira United States
Bram Lancee Netherlands
Beth A. Rubin United States
Benjamin Radcliff relative to Andrew C. Eggers United States Andrew C. Eggers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Andrew C. Eggers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Radcliff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Radcliff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Radcliff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Radcliff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Radcliff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Radcliff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Radcliff. The network helps show where Benjamin Radcliff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Radcliff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Radcliff Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Radcliff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001180
2 1997154
3 2000151
4 1992144
5 2008115
6 1995104
7 199595
8 200993
9 200890
10 199587
11 201384
12 199483
13 200567
14 201460
15 200152
16 201849
17 200548
18 199547
19 201047
20 201145

About Benjamin Radcliff

Benjamin Radcliff is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Economics and Econometrics and General Health Professions, having authored 66 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (20 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (17 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (12 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (11 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (10 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (7 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (7 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (382 citations), Political Science and International Relations (1.2k citations), Public Administration (166 citations), Social Psychology (660 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (602 citations). Benjamin Radcliff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Alexander C. Pacek, Patrick Flavin, Patricia A. Davis, Amitava Krishna Dutt, Daniel J. Myers, Matthew T. Loveland, David Sikkink, Robert Bohrer, Richard J. Timpone and Bradford Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Political Research Quarterly, The Journal of Politics, Social Indicators Research, American Political Science Review and American Journal of Political Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact