Social Indicators Research

5.6k papers and 159.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.6k papers published in Social Indicators Research in the last decades have received a total of 159.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Indicators Research usually cover Sociology and Political Science (2.5k papers), Social Psychology (1.8k papers) and General Health Professions (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Role of Positive Emotions in Well-Being (1.6k papers), Health disparities and outcomes (1.0k papers) and Income, Poverty, and Inequality (810 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Indicators Research are Ed Diener, Ruut Veenhoven, Robert A. Cummins, Alex C. Michalos, E. Scott Huebner, Sonja Lyubomirsky, Heidi S. Lepper, Robert Biswas‐Diener, M. Joseph Sirgy and Bruce Headey.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social Indicators Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Indicators Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Indicators Research.

Countries where authors publish in Social Indicators Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Indicators Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Indicators Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Indicators Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025