Greg A. Caldeira
Impact in
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
Papers in
- Law 4
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 2
- Jury Decision Making Processes 2
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 1
-
- Law, Rights, and Freedoms 2
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 1
- Co-authors
- Stuart S. Nagel (1 shared paper)Laurens Walker (1 shared paper)John Thibaut (1 shared paper)Fred I. Greenstein (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Law & Society Review (1 paper)American Journal of Political Science (1 paper)Political Science Quarterly (1 paper)Polity (1 paper)The Western Political Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Greg A. Caldeira
5 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Greg A. Caldeira's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 868
- General Decision Sciences 79
- Public Administration 94
- Safety Research 221
- Sociology and Political Science 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Greg A. Caldeira
This map shows the geographic impact of Greg A. Caldeira's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg A. Caldeira with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg A. Caldeira more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Greg A. Caldeira
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg A. Caldeira. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg A. Caldeira. The network helps show where Greg A. Caldeira may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Greg A. Caldeira, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 1976 | 2245 |
| 2 | 1980 | 52 | |
| 3 | 1980 | 25 | |
| 4 | 1977 | 19 | |
| 5 | Judicial Incentives: Some Evidence from Urban Trial Courts | 1977 | 3 |
| 6 | 1978 | 1 | |
| 7 | THE INCENTIVES OF TRIAL JUDGES AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE | 2016 | 0 |
About Greg A. Caldeira
Greg A. Caldeira is a scholar working on Law, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Communication, having authored 7 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (2 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (2 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (1 paper), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (868 citations), General Decision Sciences (79 citations), Public Administration (94 citations), Safety Research (221 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.1k citations). Greg A. Caldeira has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Stuart S. Nagel, Laurens Walker, John Thibaut and Fred I. Greenstein. Their work appears in journals such as Law & Society Review, American Journal of Political Science, Political Science Quarterly, Polity and The Western Political Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.