Journal of Oncology Practice

1.7k papers and 36.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Journal of Oncology Practice in the last decades have received a total of 36.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Oncology Practice usually cover Oncology (619 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (541 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (541 papers) specifically the topics of Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (432 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (329 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (295 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Oncology Practice are Sarah Temin, Christina Lacchetti, Gary H. Lyman, Suanna S. Bruinooge, Amy P. Abernethy, Pamela B. Mangu, S. Yousuf Zafar, Michael A. Goldstein, Daniel F. Hayes and Ethan Basch.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Oncology Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Oncology Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Oncology Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Oncology Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Oncology Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Oncology Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Oncology Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025