Robert Bohrer

875 citations
49 papers · 700 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Bohrer

41 papers receiving 615 citations

Peers

Robert Bohrer
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Statistics and Probability 253
  • Management Science and Operations Research 115
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 57
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 81
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 66
Replace Jee‐Seon Kim with:
Jee‐Seon Kim United States
David Magis Belgium
Ivo Ponocny Austria
Minjeong Jeon United States
Gregor Sočan Slovenia
David J. Krus United States
Leo J. Th. van der Kamp Netherlands
Ronald Schoenberg United States
Simon Grund Germany
Donald T. Searls United States
Robert Bohrer relative to Jee‐Seon Kim United States Jee‐Seon Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Jee‐Seon Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Bohrer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Bohrer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Bohrer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Bohrer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Bohrer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Bohrer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Bohrer. The network helps show where Robert Bohrer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Bohrer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Bohrer Line = papers co-authored together Robert Bohrer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980138
2 200041
3 197839
4 197238
5 198137
6 198535
7 197235
8 196733
9 197933
10 198032
11 197325
12 200019
13 198118
14 197316
15 197315
16 198414
17 201914
18 198113
19 198912
20 20059

About Robert Bohrer

Robert Bohrer is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 49 papers that have together received 700 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (8 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (8 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (5 papers), Machine Learning and Algorithms (5 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (4 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (3 papers) and Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (253 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (115 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (57 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (81 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (66 citations). Robert Bohrer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include George K. Francis, Gideon Keren, Stephen W. Porges, Fritz Drasgow, Philip M. McCabe, Alexander C. Pacek, Benjamin Radcliff, T.A. Yancey, Mark J. Schervish and George G. Judge. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics), Electoral Studies, Biometrika and Technometrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact