Antonio Mulet

177 papers receiving 7k citations

Peers

Antonio Mulet
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Food Science 4.6k
  • Biotechnology 805
  • Animal Science and Zoology 497
  • Biochemistry 361
  • Analytical Chemistry 184
Replace Juan A. Cárcel with:
Juan A. Cárcel Spain
Jose Vicente Garcia-Perez Spain
Baoguo Xu China
Carmen Rosselló Spain
Cunshan Zhou China
Larysa Paniwnyk United Kingdom
RAYMOND F. MAWSON Australia
Susana Simal Spain
Albert Ibarz Spain
Navin Kumar Rastogi India
Antonio Mulet relative to Juan A. Cárcel Spain Juan A. Cárcel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Juan A. Cárcel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Antonio Mulet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Antonio Mulet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antonio Mulet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antonio Mulet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Antonio Mulet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antonio Mulet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antonio Mulet. The network helps show where Antonio Mulet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Antonio Mulet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Antonio Mulet Line = papers co-authored together Antonio Mulet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 177 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011397
2 2011256
3 2007188
4 2004187
5 2003160
6 2005158
7 2007155
8 1995152
9 2007152
10 2013148
11 2009138
12 2005137
13 2015127
14 1994122
15 1989114
16 2017111
17 1996100
18 2007100
19 201199
20 200391

About Antonio Mulet

Antonio Mulet is a scholar working on Food Science, Biotechnology, Animal Science and Zoology, Mechanics of Materials and Plant Science, having authored 177 papers that have together received 7.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food Drying and Modeling (108 papers), Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena (12 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (11 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (11 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (10 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (9 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (8 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (4.6k citations), Biotechnology (805 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (497 citations), Biochemistry (361 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (184 citations). Antonio Mulet has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Brazil and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Juan A. Cárcel, Jose Vicente Garcia-Perez, Benedito Jose, Carmen Rosselló, Neus Sanjuán, José Bon, Enrique Riera, Susana Simal, G. Clemente and A. Berna. Their work appears in journals such as Drying Technology, Journal of Food Engineering, Journal of Food Science, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture and Food Science and Technology International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact