Anna Forsyth

25 papers receiving 498 citations

Anna Forsyth's Hit Papers

Blinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomized controlled trials 2021 · 187 citations
1870+1+3Years since publication50100150

Peers

Anna Forsyth
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Biological Psychiatry 57
  • Clinical Psychology 288
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 141
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 127
  • Periodontics 29
Replace Collin Reiff with:
Collin Reiff United States
Anna Neukirch Germany
Ricarda Evens Germany
Joseph P. Barsuglia United States
Bruno Roméo France
Eduardo Ekman Schenberg Brazil
Ingmar Gorman United States
Samuel Turton United Kingdom
A. Dittrich Switzerland
Federico Zamberlán Argentina
Anna Forsyth relative to Collin Reiff United States Collin Reiff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Collin Reiff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Forsyth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Forsyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Forsyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Forsyth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Forsyth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Forsyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Forsyth. The network helps show where Anna Forsyth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Forsyth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Forsyth Line = papers co-authored together Anna Forsyth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Blinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomized controlled trials
Hit paper breakdown →
2021187
2 201943
3 202337
4 202235
5 201931
6 201825
7 202318
8 201917
9 201916
10 201915
11 201913
12 202312
13 202111
14 20249
15 20247
16 20216
17 20206
18 20185
19 20203
20 20251

About Anna Forsyth

Anna Forsyth is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Organic Chemistry, having authored 27 papers that have together received 502 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (11 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers) and Oral microbiology and periodontitis research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (57 citations), Clinical Psychology (288 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (141 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (127 citations) and Periodontics (29 citations). Anna Forsyth has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Suresh Muthukumaraswamy, Thomas Lumley, Rachael L. Sumner, Rebecca McMillan, Joerg F. Hipp, Elizabeth A. Maxwell, Juergen Dukart, Gemma Malpas, Doug Campbell and Rhys Ponton. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry, Brain Topography, Neuropharmacology and Human Brain Mapping.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact