Frederick Sundram

81 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Frederick Sundram
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Biological Psychiatry 85
  • Clinical Psychology 460
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 304
  • Applied Psychology 93
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 293
Replace Melissa A. Culhane with:
Melissa A. Culhane United States
Kelly E. Courtney United States
Laurence Lalanne France
Kristi A. Sacco United States
Orsola Gambini Italy
Karen L. Hanson United States
Catherine P. Domier United States
Ari D. Kalechstein United States
Marco Aurélio Monteiro Peluso Brazil
Cosima Locher Switzerland
Frederick Sundram relative to Melissa A. Culhane United States Melissa A. Culhane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Melissa A. Culhane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Sundram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Sundram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Sundram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Sundram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Sundram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Sundram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Sundram. The network helps show where Frederick Sundram may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Sundram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Sundram Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Sundram links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016123
2 2011107
3 201567
4 201063
5 201954
6 201752
7 201744
8 201943
9 202143
10 201036
11 201833
12 201030
13 201828
14 201527
15 201726
16 201626
17 202024
18 201822
19 201721
20 201521

About Frederick Sundram

Frederick Sundram is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Social Psychology, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (11 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (8 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (7 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (7 papers) and Treatment of Major Depression (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (85 citations), Clinical Psychology (460 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (304 citations), Applied Psychology (93 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (293 citations). Frederick Sundram has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gary Cheung, David B Menkes, William K. Diprose, Suresh Muthukumaraswamy, Rachael L. Sumner, Sally Merry, Hussain Alyami, Mohsen Alyami, Gareth J. Barker and Rebecca McMillan. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging, International Psychogeriatrics and Neuropharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact